Archive for the ‘MSN Loophole’ Category

I recently caught wind of a rather controversial video for msn keywords ranking it’s about cutting edge msn search engine traffic strategies called MSN SEO Loophole - created by a guy named Dave Kelly.
 
 As far as I know, Major of internet marketer today are targeting Google, Yahoo traffic rather than MSN search engine. The fact is - it’s getting harder and harder for the “little guy” to get any kind of meaningful web presence on the web these days on these top2 search engines.
 
 You may found that sometime we got 50 sites built, and we’ve got only 2 of them with some pages ranking on the front page of Google, yahoo search engine for a decent keyword. Although, we can get some traffic from the search engine, make a few sales here and there, but then our pages disappear from search engine due new competitor coming in using the same keyword and lots of them very soon.
 
 No much people is actually targeting MSN keywords, but one thing should not be ignore is that there are also millions upon millions of people who use MSN search engine daily - one thing that several marketers will tell you (including ourselves) is that MSN search engine traffic converts far better than Google traffic. It’s a different demographic altogether.
 
 Some people are said that they target msn keywords and built 50 sites and 45 of them are able to ranking in the top 3 positions in MSN search engine, day in, day out for ultra competitive msn keywords.
 
 Dave Kelly are even more smart guys literally figured out how to get #1 rank for practically ANY keyword phrase they want in MSN search engine. and yet, get it FAST within few days. It plainly shows some truly unreal organic rankings that he’s been achieving (by the hundreds) with, well - what seems like an actual msn search engine “hack”… Its not about 5 word, long tail, msn keyword phrases either. they’re talking about major keywords….like ’search engine’, in markets with like…25,000,000 competing pages! and It’s real white hat money sites…that in most cases will rank for a long time.
 
 I have no idea how these guys accomplished this msn keywords… All I know is I wanna get me some of msn search engine traffic too!
 
 After you’ve checked out the video, let me know your thoughts. This could have a major impact for all of us…

kenneth sea
http://www.articlesbase.com/seo-articles/rank-high-for-any-keywords-on-msn-search-engine-634679.html

I recently caught wind of a rather controversial video for msn keywords ranking it’s about cutting edge msn search engine traffic strategies called MSN SEO Loophole - created by a guy named Dave Kelly.
 
 As far as I know, Major of internet marketer today are targeting Google, Yahoo traffic rather than MSN search engine. The fact is - it’s getting harder and harder for the “little guy” to get any kind of meaningful web presence on the web these days on these top2 search engines.
 
 You may found that sometime we got 50 sites built, and we’ve got only 2 of them with some pages ranking on the front page of Google, yahoo search engine for a decent keyword. Although, we can get some traffic from the search engine, make a few sales here and there, but then our pages disappear from search engine due new competitor coming in using the same keyword and lots of them very soon.
 
 No much people is actually targeting MSN keywords, but one thing should not be ignore is that there are also millions upon millions of people who use MSN search engine daily - one thing that several marketers will tell you (including ourselves) is that MSN search engine traffic converts far better than Google traffic. It’s a different demographic altogether.
 
 Some people are said that they target msn keywords and built 50 sites and 45 of them are able to ranking in the top 3 positions in MSN search engine, day in, day out for ultra competitive msn keywords.
 
 Dave Kelly are even more smart guys literally figured out how to get #1 rank for practically ANY keyword phrase they want in MSN search engine. and yet, get it FAST within few days. It plainly shows some truly unreal organic rankings that he’s been achieving (by the hundreds) with, well - what seems like an actual msn search engine “hack”… Its not about 5 word, long tail, msn keyword phrases either. they’re talking about major keywords….like ’search engine’, in markets with like…25,000,000 competing pages! and It’s real white hat money sites…that in most cases will rank for a long time.
 
 I have no idea how these guys accomplished this msn keywords… All I know is I wanna get me some of msn search engine traffic too!
 
 After you’ve checked out the video, let me know your thoughts. This could have a major impact for all of us…

kenneth sea
http://www.articlesbase.com/seo-articles/rank-high-for-any-keywords-on-msn-search-engine-634679.html

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/34382653/ns/health-health_care/

Don’t you just love how the health care bill keeps popping up all kinds of items that will reduce patient care and not deliver the promises of the administration?

A report yesterday claimed that by the year 2019, 24 million Americans would still be without HC benefits, and now they show a complete reversal by allowing insurers to set a monthly maximum benefit allowance to the insured?? This whole charade is a self perpetuating cluster-f**k on wheels.

So-called wellness incentives could introduce a colossal loophole.

"Everybody said that we’re going to be ending discrimination based on preexisting conditions. But this is in effect discrimination again based on preexisting conditions," said Ann Kempski of the Service Employees International Union.
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/33336289/ns/politics-washington_post/

Should you be forced to have a yearly medical exams & vaccinations?
chmacque - I agree with you that about the effects of smoking and overeating. But at the same time, these substances are approved by the gov (FDA) for sale. They are legal. Don’t blame me for getting fat while using a legal substance. Shouldn’t we first weed out all the illegal substances? I think we should all get tested for drugs. Those people should be helped first, since their acitivity is illegal, and therefore must be more harmful to society.

ption to very strongly encourage such.

The basic principle is a smoker and severely overweight people cause their own
chmacque - I agree with you that about the effects of smoking and overeating. But at the same time, these substances are approved by the gov (FDA) for sale. They are legal. Don’t blame me for getting fat while using a legal substance. Shouldn’t we first weed out all the illegal substances? I think we should all get tested for drugs. Those people should be helped first, since their activity is illegal, and therefore must be more harmful to society.
Patriot - I believe you stats that premie death rate in EU is better. But what about deaths from cancers?

Nope. They are discriminating on age as well, because the old cost more, and how is that NOT a preexisting condition? It is simply the one that comes to all. In fact the reason they lowered the penalties is they know a lot of people between 50 and medicare would no longer be able to afford insurance under the plan. They are merely switching the groups of uninsured, from the young who rarely pay more in a year in care than they would pay in premiums to begin with, so don’t want the expense of insurance but will be forced to pay for it, to those older who actually use it but now won’t be able to afford it.

And they say they are doing this ‘for’ the young, not ‘to’ them, but actuarially, it makes no sense for the young to buy anything but the most high deduction catastrophic coverage.

I recently caught wind of a rather controversial video for msn keywords ranking it’s about cutting edge msn search engine traffic strategies called MSN SEO Loophole - created by a guy named Dave Kelly.
 
 As far as I know, Major of internet marketer today are targeting Google, Yahoo traffic rather than MSN search engine. The fact is - it’s getting harder and harder for the “little guy” to get any kind of meaningful web presence on the web these days on these top2 search engines.
 
 You may found that sometime we got 50 sites built, and we’ve got only 2 of them with some pages ranking on the front page of Google, yahoo search engine for a decent keyword. Although, we can get some traffic from the search engine, make a few sales here and there, but then our pages disappear from search engine due new competitor coming in using the same keyword and lots of them very soon.
 
 No much people is actually targeting MSN keywords, but one thing should not be ignore is that there are also millions upon millions of people who use MSN search engine daily - one thing that several marketers will tell you (including ourselves) is that MSN search engine traffic converts far better than Google traffic. It’s a different demographic altogether.
 
 Some people are said that they target msn keywords and built 50 sites and 45 of them are able to ranking in the top 3 positions in MSN search engine, day in, day out for ultra competitive msn keywords.
 
 Dave Kelly are even more smart guys literally figured out how to get #1 rank for practically ANY keyword phrase they want in MSN search engine. and yet, get it FAST within few days. It plainly shows some truly unreal organic rankings that he’s been achieving (by the hundreds) with, well - what seems like an actual msn search engine “hack”… Its not about 5 word, long tail, msn keyword phrases either. they’re talking about major keywords….like ’search engine’, in markets with like…25,000,000 competing pages! and It’s real white hat money sites…that in most cases will rank for a long time.
 
 I have no idea how these guys accomplished this msn keywords… All I know is I wanna get me some of msn search engine traffic too!
 
 After you’ve checked out the video, let me know your thoughts. This could have a major impact for all of us…

kenneth sea
http://www.articlesbase.com/seo-articles/rank-high-for-any-keywords-on-msn-search-engine-634679.html

I recently caught wind of a rather controversial video for msn keywords ranking it’s about cutting edge msn search engine traffic strategies called MSN SEO Loophole - created by a guy named Dave Kelly.
 
 As far as I know, Major of internet marketer today are targeting Google, Yahoo traffic rather than MSN search engine. The fact is - it’s getting harder and harder for the “little guy” to get any kind of meaningful web presence on the web these days on these top2 search engines.
 
 You may found that sometime we got 50 sites built, and we’ve got only 2 of them with some pages ranking on the front page of Google, yahoo search engine for a decent keyword. Although, we can get some traffic from the search engine, make a few sales here and there, but then our pages disappear from search engine due new competitor coming in using the same keyword and lots of them very soon.
 
 No much people is actually targeting MSN keywords, but one thing should not be ignore is that there are also millions upon millions of people who use MSN search engine daily - one thing that several marketers will tell you (including ourselves) is that MSN search engine traffic converts far better than Google traffic. It’s a different demographic altogether.
 
 Some people are said that they target msn keywords and built 50 sites and 45 of them are able to ranking in the top 3 positions in MSN search engine, day in, day out for ultra competitive msn keywords.
 
 Dave Kelly are even more smart guys literally figured out how to get #1 rank for practically ANY keyword phrase they want in MSN search engine. and yet, get it FAST within few days. It plainly shows some truly unreal organic rankings that he’s been achieving (by the hundreds) with, well - what seems like an actual msn search engine “hack”… Its not about 5 word, long tail, msn keyword phrases either. they’re talking about major keywords….like ’search engine’, in markets with like…25,000,000 competing pages! and It’s real white hat money sites…that in most cases will rank for a long time.
 
 I have no idea how these guys accomplished this msn keywords… All I know is I wanna get me some of msn search engine traffic too!
 
 After you’ve checked out the video, let me know your thoughts. This could have a major impact for all of us…

kenneth sea
http://www.articlesbase.com/seo-articles/rank-high-for-any-keywords-on-msn-search-engine-634679.html

Most search engine comparison tables will show you usage statistics that are something like this:

64% Google

14% Yahoo

14% MSN

08% AOL, All the Web, and all others combined

Those are simple search engine usage statistics. While they might be accurate as far as how much a search engine is used there is a much bigger picture to consider, especially if you own a business Website.

Let me give you an example. I just met with a local florist last month to help him figure out why his pay-per-click numbers seemed so skewed. Although 70% of his visits came from Google Adsense, only 30% of his sales came from those leads. While MSN only supplied 28% of his traffic, it generated 64% of his sales. That’s almost exactly opposite what you would assume. Why is this?

There are a number of reasons but here are the main ones…

1) MSN is the default search engine on any new Windows installation. With more people aged 55 plus getting new computers, they generally stick with the default home page of MSN.com.

2) MSN is often the preferred choice for many small business owners and working professionals due to the information available at a glance on the MSN.com home page, such as stock info, breaking news, and anything else you want to customize.

3) MSN has a higher number of users in the age specific financial sweet zones of 34 to 54 and 55 plus than Yahoo or Google. MSN also has more income earners between $30K and $100K than Google or Yahoo.

And a bit more generally, Google seems to be the cool place where kids, teens and tweens go for info. That’s perfect if your business caters to this market but if you’re looking for the credit card holder who has better stuff to do than surf the Web and wants to make the purchase and move on, then MSN is a good bet.

So how can you start to benefit in time for the holidays? (And yes. I know Thanksgiving is this week.) Here are your best two bets:

The Pay Per Click Method

You can setup an adCenter account at https://adcenter.microsoft.com/ and start getting targeted traffic right away. The drawback of course, is that you are paying for leads. The upside is that the chances of having kids click on your links just out of curiosity are pretty slim.

Organic Search Engine Optimization

MSN is the easiest search engine of all to get natural search engine ranking on and one of the more famous SEO experts, Dave Kelly, even developed a method specifically to get on top of MSN quickly, called Search Engine Loophole http://www.SELoophole.com ($67.) BTW, I found it also works on Yahoo for quick top 3 results.

So, to summarize, it’s worth it to take a closer look at MSN. While it might not be the most popular in the world, chances are it is popular with those who want to buy what you are selling.

Michael Small
http://www.articlesbase.com/internet-articles/is-msn-better-for-business-than-google-656578.html

"Noting that wealthier Americans would indeed pay more, Biden said: “It’s time to be patriotic … time to jump in, time to be part of the deal, time to help get America out of the rut.” …

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080918/ap_on_el_pr/biden_taxes

Why do so many politicians work every tax loophole they can find?

Example Obama:

He has invested at least $1 million in a fund that yields tax-free income.
http://articles.moneycentral.msn.com/Investing/MutualFunds/HowTaxBoostingObamaCutsHisOwn.aspx
Yes Biden’s record of charitable given is very pathetic, excellent point.

Let’s start by abolishing EITC. Why should people who don’t even pay taxes get welfare checks from the IRS? What a sham over all of us who actually write a check and pay! If the feds want to give federal welfare why don’t they pass honest legislation to give certain earners welfare checks? I’ll tell you why they do not abolish it - they are buying votes!

I’ve read Twilight, New Moon, Eclipse and Breaking Dawn

I found the serious moderately enjoyable. I failed to recognise the paedophilia, necrophilia, stalking and sexism when I reading the books. Thankfully, I recognise all that now.

My friends though think Twilight is fantastic. They even think that Stephanie Meyer’s writing style is better than JK Rowling. I don’t hate Twilight, but I don’t think it’s brilliant, either. The storyline is predictable and there are so many loopholes everywhere, it gets a bit agitating.

Quote from a friend in an MSN conversation:
‘jk rowlings writing is that standard of a 10 year old’

One of my friends said that I only agree with something if everyone else does. That’s not true. I agree, or disagree, with something if I feel the URGE to. I gain a thorough understanding of what it is, and then I form a decision. Still, thousands of literature experts, Stephan King among them (http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/29001524) think that Twilight’s storyline is stupid and the author’s style of writing is, too. They conclude that it is only popular because of the sexual tensions between the two characters. I couldn’t agree more. I also think it’s only popular because such a character as Edward Cullen exists.

I don’t like Smeyer’s writing style much either. I think it doesn’t cover enough in some places, and in other’s, I think it covers far too much.

One of my friends wouldn’t understand this though, because he’s only just started New Moon. Maybe he’ll change his mind hough as he progresses through the series, I don’t know.

Breaking dawn was the worst. But what do you think?
Do you like Meyer? What do you think of other people’s thoughts on her? What do you make of her writing style? And although my friend agrees that Harry Potter’s storyline is good, he thinks that JK Rowling’s writing is the standard of a 10 year old. Do you agree or disagree?
Couldn’t agree with you more, Zoie.

[Purple prose and thesaurus abuse probably appear to be pretty impressive to inexperienced readers and writers, hence why many young girls and teens think that Meyer is a better writer than Rowling.]

That is exactly it. Also, it is probably true that Meyer uses a thesaurus. I’m also sure that she is ignorant of the definitions for the words she uses.
I APOLOGISE FOR THE AMOUNT OF SPELLING MISTAKES I HAVE MADE IN THIS QUESTION.

It is so unlike me. Might I add though that the MSN quote was copied and pasted from the original conversation. I didn’t retype it. And the grammatical errors are those of my friend.

J.K. Rowling is an accomplished writer with great plot, story structure, a descriptive basis and an amazing story. She has climbed the ladder of society with hard work and amazing literature, and she truly deserves to be where she is. The Harry Potter series opened the gates for one of the biggest floods of science fiction and fantasy books the likes of which the world has never seen. They are works of art that are not to be compared to something as sappy and sloppy as the Twilight books.

Stephenie Meyer, on the other hand, is a young and inexperienced writer who appeals to teenage girls when they are most vulnerable by using words that she has taken from the dictionary and the thesaurus to make them look better, and combining them with the typical, sappy, teenage love story with fangs. The only reason that this kind of fiction appeals to teenagers is because they want this type of romance in their lives. It’s not fair to compare an author as common and inexperienced as Meyer who only appeals to young women, to someone as accomplished as Rowling who appeals to readers and writers of all ages. The fuss that has taken place in North America over a silly vampire tale is completely washed out by the stories of wizards that grow in sophistication as they are written. The Twilight series stays the same for the entire four books, a monotonous, whiny main character’s narration, a non-maturing theme, and words that hardly make sense in the places that they are written. Harry Potter and his friends mature in words, actions and life experiences as they grow to become young men and women and are exemplary of people that we should grow and aspire to be like, instead of wanting to be a minor married to a sparkly vampire.

In short, J.K. Rowling is more accomplished, more poised and more worthy to be world-renowned than Meyer, an author who only got to where she is by depending on the bevy of needy teenage girls and her desktop thesaurus.

I noticed that this article came out with Paulson stating that he wasn’t going to have the money from the bailout be used for what it was inititally intended to be used for. I have to ask because this was VOTED upon. So isn’t it rather misleading to have said that it’ll be used for X when after it’s agreed upon they change to have it used for YZ??

I read that the stocks lowered a bit because of his announcement and I have to wonder. Is it because the government said that they were doing one thing and ended up doing another and therefore leaving less faith?

They stated how we HAD to vote in favor of the bailout yet it appears not much has been done with that money as of yet. And more bailouts are on the way when the first one hasn’t even really been sort through yet. And they commented also about these big CEO bonuses and there was a loophole as to how they could do this. I thought part of the bailout was that the government would have complete understandings of what was being done with the money.

I guess I’m just curious if you think it was misleading or if it’s unethical? Not sure what the exact word is that I’m looking for here.

Your thoughts?? Or did I misinterpret something here??

Article is here: http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/27677764

I’m not acting as if anything. I’m asking a question. Because those that voted on this, did so with the intention it would be used to purchase bad debt. NOT to purchase stock. Unless I misinterpreted or misunderstood.

I’m just looking for information because I find it interesting. No accusations being thrown out on my end.

Treasury Secretary Paulson said the administration has decided that the money that was approved to fund the government’s purchase of sub-prime mortgages from banks could be better spend by supporting lenders who provided credit directly to consumers, including credit card companies and banks and other companies that finance cars and other items.

The government now seems to want o write off the mortgage crisis by putting cash into the hands of banks through the purchase of their stocks so they can resume lending. The real challenge facing the banks is not a one-flow of cash from the sale of stock to the government. It’s to get that cash circulating by fixing the problem with mortgage-backed securities, and the involves everything from the mortgage origination process to the sale of the MBS to investors,

This new plans is nothing like what congress approved and the president signed a few weeks back.

Banks that have gotten huge inflows of cash from the sale of their stocks to the government have not resumed normal lending. Their credit standards are higher, which is good, but they seem to think they can do whatever they want to with the money.

The government should tell those banks to either use the money for what it was intended for or GIVE IT BACK NOW and keep your damn stock.

This “change of direction” has got investors confused and that is part of the reason the market is down today. The markets hate uncertainty. Changing the rules after the game has started is a travesty.

Is this unethical? No, it’s not. It’s whatever the word is for whatever is twice as bad as “unethical”